<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Kromey&#039;s Adventures</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kromey.us/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kromey.us</link>
	<description>Just a nerd with aspirations to delusions of grandeur</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 02:45:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RAID 10 with mdadm by Gavin</title>
		<link>http://kromey.us/2009/08/raid-10-with-mdadm-65.html/comment-page-1#comment-390</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 02:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kromey.sd41.net/?p=65#comment-390</guid>
		<description>Nice post. One cute feature of mdadm Raid10 that you didn&#039;t mention is that it doesn&#039;t require even numbers of drives (Raid10 w/N=2 works fine on 3 or 5 drives for instance, which space available of 3/2 or 5/2 in each case), and it also works nicely for values of N&gt;2, which are reasonably unusual in traditional Raid1+0 layouts.

For instance, with today&#039;s large disks you can get extra safety by using N=3, which would allow you to lose 2 disks without losing your data. If you used 4 * 2TB disks with N=3, for instance, you&#039;d get 8/3TB of usable space, and be able to survive the loss of 2 disks. Gives you some interesting tradeoffs to explore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post. One cute feature of mdadm Raid10 that you didn&#8217;t mention is that it doesn&#8217;t require even numbers of drives (Raid10 w/N=2 works fine on 3 or 5 drives for instance, which space available of 3/2 or 5/2 in each case), and it also works nicely for values of N&gt;2, which are reasonably unusual in traditional Raid1+0 layouts.</p>
<p>For instance, with today&#8217;s large disks you can get extra safety by using N=3, which would allow you to lose 2 disks without losing your data. If you used 4 * 2TB disks with N=3, for instance, you&#8217;d get 8/3TB of usable space, and be able to survive the loss of 2 disks. Gives you some interesting tradeoffs to explore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Name-Based Virtual Hosts With nginx on IPv6 by Stephane</title>
		<link>http://kromey.us/2011/06/named-based-virtual-hosts-with-nginx-on-ipv6-423.html/comment-page-1#comment-366</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 08:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kromey.us/?p=423#comment-366</guid>
		<description>This post is very useful but unclear in the definition of hybrid and separate ports.

So to help other users, this is the configuration I&#039;m using in Archlinux and the latest nginx (1.2.1):

#default server
server {
  listen       80 default_server;
  listen      [::]:80 default_server ipv6only=on;

  # server_name is not to be specified in the default server
  [...]
}

# virtual host
server {
  listen       80;
  listen      [::]:80;

  server_name example.com;

  [...]
}

[etc.]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post is very useful but unclear in the definition of hybrid and separate ports.</p>
<p>So to help other users, this is the configuration I&#8217;m using in Archlinux and the latest nginx (1.2.1):</p>
<p>#default server<br />
server {<br />
  listen       80 default_server;<br />
  listen      [::]:80 default_server ipv6only=on;</p>
<p>  # server_name is not to be specified in the default server<br />
  [...]<br />
}</p>
<p># virtual host<br />
server {<br />
  listen       80;<br />
  listen      [::]:80;</p>
<p>  server_name example.com;</p>
<p>  [...]<br />
}</p>
<p>[etc.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Name-Based Virtual Hosts With nginx on IPv6 by chain</title>
		<link>http://kromey.us/2011/06/named-based-virtual-hosts-with-nginx-on-ipv6-423.html/comment-page-1#comment-323</link>
		<dc:creator>chain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kromey.us/?p=423#comment-323</guid>
		<description>Thank you, this really saved my head banging against the wall.

If you do not specify the listen clauses in the vhosts, you will ALWAYS get the default host for IPv6. Well, first thing was to figure out that it&#039;s actually IPv6 only. Try that in a hybrid network.

Anyways, thanks a lot. Works like a charm!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, this really saved my head banging against the wall.</p>
<p>If you do not specify the listen clauses in the vhosts, you will ALWAYS get the default host for IPv6. Well, first thing was to figure out that it&#8217;s actually IPv6 only. Try that in a hybrid network.</p>
<p>Anyways, thanks a lot. Works like a charm!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apache on Windows: Serving Files From the Network by mr.b</title>
		<link>http://kromey.us/2009/09/apache-on-windows-serving-files-from-the-network-150.html/comment-page-1#comment-319</link>
		<dc:creator>mr.b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kromey.sd41.net/?p=150#comment-319</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s what Apache docs have to say about using network resources:

http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.1/platform/windows.html#windrivemap

Basically, it&#039;s the same thing as you have come up with, but it also provides the answer as to why it doesn&#039;t work the way you&#039;d expect it to work (by simply using mapped drive, for instance).

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s what Apache docs have to say about using network resources:</p>
<p><a href="http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.1/platform/windows.html#windrivemap" rel="nofollow">http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.1/platform/windows.html#windrivemap</a></p>
<p>Basically, it&#8217;s the same thing as you have come up with, but it also provides the answer as to why it doesn&#8217;t work the way you&#8217;d expect it to work (by simply using mapped drive, for instance).</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Name-Based Virtual Hosts With nginx on IPv6 by diego s.</title>
		<link>http://kromey.us/2011/06/named-based-virtual-hosts-with-nginx-on-ipv6-423.html/comment-page-1#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator>diego s.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 19:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kromey.us/?p=423#comment-304</guid>
		<description>Thank you for sharing this, you just saved my mental health!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for sharing this, you just saved my mental health!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Running a Minecraft Server from a RAM Disk by Nameless</title>
		<link>http://kromey.us/2011/08/running-a-minecraft-server-from-a-ram-disk-452.html/comment-page-1#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>Nameless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 14:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kromey.us/?p=452#comment-293</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t you need a pause between these two lines?

screen -p 0 -S minecraft -X eval &#039;stuff &quot;save-all&quot;15&#039;
rsync -a --delete-after /srv/mc/ /path/to/minecraft/files/

The screen command wouldn&#039;t wait for minecraft to finish saving, so the script would execute rsync almost immediately after sending the save-all command, before minecraft has had time to save the worlds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t you need a pause between these two lines?</p>
<p>screen -p 0 -S minecraft -X eval &#8216;stuff &#8220;save-all&#8221;15&#8242;<br />
rsync -a &#8211;delete-after /srv/mc/ /path/to/minecraft/files/</p>
<p>The screen command wouldn&#8217;t wait for minecraft to finish saving, so the script would execute rsync almost immediately after sending the save-all command, before minecraft has had time to save the worlds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Move an SVN Repository From One Server to Another by Mauro Spivak</title>
		<link>http://kromey.us/2011/06/move-an-svn-repository-from-one-server-to-another-433.html/comment-page-1#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>Mauro Spivak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 22:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kromey.us/?p=433#comment-289</guid>
		<description>Hey! Thanks for the info. 

There is a mistake in the last snippet that got me a bit crazy. It should be:
&lt;code&gt;svn switch --relocate http://newdomain.com/path/to/old/repo http://newdomain.com/path/to/new/repo /path/to/working/copy&lt;/code&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.1/re27.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Source&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey! Thanks for the info. </p>
<p>There is a mistake in the last snippet that got me a bit crazy. It should be:<br />
<code>svn switch --relocate <a href="http://newdomain.com/path/to/old/repo" rel="nofollow">http://newdomain.com/path/to/old/repo</a> <a href="http://newdomain.com/path/to/new/repo" rel="nofollow">http://newdomain.com/path/to/new/repo</a> /path/to/working/copy</code></p>
<p><a href="http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.1/re27.html" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Microsoft SQL Server 2008 Times Out on First Connection Attempt? by Andy Brandt</title>
		<link>http://kromey.us/2011/06/microsoft-sql-server-2008-times-out-on-first-connection-attempt-447.html/comment-page-1#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Brandt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kromey.us/?p=447#comment-288</guid>
		<description>i had the exact same problem, but running SQL Server 2005, and following your instructions,  unblocking the port listed under the IPAll section worked like a charm. thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i had the exact same problem, but running <acronym title="Structured Query Language">SQL</acronym> Server 2005, and following your instructions,  unblocking the port listed under the IPAll section worked like a charm. thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Kromey&#8217;s SpamGuard by Lee</title>
		<link>http://kromey.us/kromeys-spamguard/comment-page-1#comment-283</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 17:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kromey.sd41.net/?page_id=195#comment-283</guid>
		<description>So, while we&#039;re waiting for Kromey&#039;s Spamguard to reach Beta, what&#039;s the next best thing for people too cheap to use Akismet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, while we&#8217;re waiting for Kromey&#8217;s Spamguard to reach Beta, what&#8217;s the next best thing for people too cheap to use Akismet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RAID 10 with mdadm by Nitestick</title>
		<link>http://kromey.us/2009/08/raid-10-with-mdadm-65.html/comment-page-1#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>Nitestick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 01:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kromey.sd41.net/?p=65#comment-260</guid>
		<description>All good again, it was pretty much what you warned about the mdadm.conf and it assembling the array. When I rebooted it didn&#039;t recognise the array, I did follow your instructions regarding using mdadm --examine --scan --config=mdadm.conf to generate the conf line however I had to manually add the raid level and number of devices for it to work. I&#039;m glad I didn&#039;t try writing anything to it :p, added that line, rebooted again and all I&#039;m a happy man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All good again, it was pretty much what you warned about the mdadm.conf and it assembling the array. When I rebooted it didn&#8217;t recognise the array, I did follow your instructions regarding using mdadm &#8211;examine &#8211;scan &#8211;config=mdadm.conf to generate the conf line however I had to manually add the raid level and number of devices for it to work. I&#8217;m glad I didn&#8217;t try writing anything to it :p, added that line, rebooted again and all I&#8217;m a happy man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
