<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kromey&#039;s Adventures &#187; Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kromey.us/category/tech/security/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kromey.us</link>
	<description>Just a nerd with aspirations to delusions of grandeur</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:48:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>This is the Proper Response to a Breach</title>
		<link>http://kromey.us/2011/05/this-is-the-proper-response-to-a-breach-418.html</link>
		<comments>http://kromey.us/2011/05/this-is-the-proper-response-to-a-breach-418.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 01:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kromey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apache]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kromey.us/?p=418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is quite dated now, but I just now stumbled upon the announcement of the breach of the Apache Software Foundation&#8217;s servers last April. While certainly an unfortunate event that could have been limited or even prevented by proper (and &#8230; <a href="http://kromey.us/2011/05/this-is-the-proper-response-to-a-breach-418.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://kromey.us/2011/05/this-is-the-proper-response-to-a-breach-418.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defend Your SSH Server</title>
		<link>http://kromey.us/2010/03/defend-your-ssh-server-316.html</link>
		<comments>http://kromey.us/2010/03/defend-your-ssh-server-316.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 02:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kromey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firewall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kromey.us/?p=316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you manage one or more servers, chances are you employ SSH for remote management of that server. If you&#8217;ve checked the logs for your SSH server (you do check your logs, don&#8217;t you?), chances are you&#8217;ve seen plenty of &#8230; <a href="http://kromey.us/2010/03/defend-your-ssh-server-316.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://kromey.us/2010/03/defend-your-ssh-server-316.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Security Through Obscurity in the News</title>
		<link>http://kromey.us/2009/08/security-through-obscurity-in-the-news-123.html</link>
		<comments>http://kromey.us/2009/08/security-through-obscurity-in-the-news-123.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kromey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kromey.sd41.net/?p=123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shortly after my previous post regarding security through obscurity, I spotted an article on ZDNet detailing a new vulnerability affecting Cisco wireless routers. If not for the reference to &#8220;skyjacking&#8221; in the title, I would have stopped reading halfway through &#8230; <a href="http://kromey.us/2009/08/security-through-obscurity-in-the-news-123.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://kromey.us/2009/08/security-through-obscurity-in-the-news-123.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Security Through Obscurity &#8211; Over-demonized?</title>
		<link>http://kromey.us/2009/08/security-through-obscurity-over-demonized-94.html</link>
		<comments>http://kromey.us/2009/08/security-through-obscurity-over-demonized-94.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 01:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kromey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kromey.sd41.net/?p=94</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone who has spent any real time dealing with computer systems&#8217; security has heard the phrase, &#8220;Security through obscurity is no security at all.&#8221; While I won&#8217;t make false claims that I&#8217;m an expert in the field of computer security, &#8230; <a href="http://kromey.us/2009/08/security-through-obscurity-over-demonized-94.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://kromey.us/2009/08/security-through-obscurity-over-demonized-94.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

