<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This is Intolerable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kromey.us/2010/04/this-is-intolerable-330.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kromey.us/2010/04/this-is-intolerable-330.html</link>
	<description>Just a nerd with aspirations to delusions of grandeur</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 19:31:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Sawyer</title>
		<link>http://kromey.us/2010/04/this-is-intolerable-330.html/comment-page-1#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Sawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 18:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kromey.us/?p=330#comment-111</guid>
		<description>I just read the article noted above. While I may not be for Gay marriage, (as I believe marriage is, first off, a religious institution) I am not against Gay people or their co-habitation as it is &lt;a href=&quot;http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment01/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a constitutional right&lt;/a&gt;.

That said, I am in full agreement with Mr. Veazey here. It&#039;s a shame that we treat our old folk like little children with no wishes or wants, and especially with ill regard for their legal precedent in their wills, etc. On top of this, it seems there is no longer any right for old folks to own property, as they can be garnished at will.

But equally depressing, though, was the disregard for Harold&#039;s final days while Clay and Harold were kept apart. This is indeed a terrible thing. There is nothing wrong with having love for another human being, even if that love is connected with sexual attraction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read the article noted above. While I may not be for Gay marriage, (as I believe marriage is, first off, a religious institution) I am not against Gay people or their co-habitation as it is <a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment01/" rel="nofollow">a constitutional right</a>.</p>
<p>That said, I am in full agreement with Mr. Veazey here. It&#8217;s a shame that we treat our old folk like little children with no wishes or wants, and especially with ill regard for their legal precedent in their wills, etc. On top of this, it seems there is no longer any right for old folks to own property, as they can be garnished at will.</p>
<p>But equally depressing, though, was the disregard for Harold&#8217;s final days while Clay and Harold were kept apart. This is indeed a terrible thing. There is nothing wrong with having love for another human being, even if that love is connected with sexual attraction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

